Re: [regrep-cc-review] What Will RepositoryItem Be? (Was: Re:[regrep-cc-review]Kickoff!)

<Quote>
If the decision is that this effort is solely going to focus on 
CCTS - to the exclusion of other requirements - then I 
believe we need to go back to the main Registry TC to
decide what the further go forward should be in addressing
those requirements.
</Quote>

This effort is solely going to focus on CCTS. More specifically, Section
7 of the CCTS specification.

Joe

David RR Webber - XML ebusiness wrote:
> 
> Message text written by "Chiusano Joseph"
> >
> I can clarify here please: the "basics" are those items defined in
> Section 7 of the CCTS spec. As long as we have covered Section 7 of the
> CCTS spec using the existing RIM and slots, we have accomplished our
> mission.
> <<<<<<
> 
> Joe,
> 
> I think you've moved the goal posts from what was proposed two or
> three weeks ago at the start of this.
> 
> While I'm pleased that - by insisting that we clarify the requirements
> upfront before we start - that we are figuring out the intentions and
> the goals here that you want to implement.
> 
> However - these are falling well short of the total requirements
> from the business perspective IMHO - and not only that - but
> also a broader audience beyond that of CCTS alone.
> 
> If the decision is that this effort is solely going to focus on
> CCTS - to the exclusion of other requirements - then I
> believe we need to go back to the main Registry TC to
> decide what the further go forward should be in addressing
> those requirements.
> 
> Thanks, DW.