<Joe>
I can clarify: We pondered that approach several months ago (updating
RIM to accomodate CCTS requirements), but decided that it was best not
to touch the RIM, but rather to either (a) create a RIM binding, or (b)
express the CCTS metadata in XML format, as a "wrapper" to the XML
representation of the Core Component (i.e. an XML serialization).
We then decided on approach (b) for several reasons,
</Joe>
This is somewhat different then what I'd suggested in my earlier post. And,
I cannot recall that we've decided on (b) -> maybe I missed that decision
somehow. I am strongly opposed to (b) because it is not our job to define
"XML wrapper" for CCTS artifacts. In that way we are doing something that is
step [2] in my earlier post, which is IMO job of UBL and/or other similar
efforts, not ours.
Nikola
