<Quote1>
with input from UBL, ATG, OAG, X12 and whoever else feels that they need
to as it progresses.
</Quote1>
AND
<Quote2>
Then - as the technical work progresses - we can get input from these
other groups too.
</Quote2>
Do we really believe that this will happen in the timeframe that we have
for this work?
Joe
David RR Webber - XML ebusiness wrote:
>
> Joe,
>
> Please lets not re-open that whole argument!
>
> We already decided that we are best equipped to make
> this happen - with input from UBL, ATG, OAG, X12 and
> whoever else feels that they need to as it progresses.
>
> Of course - clarifying the requirements upfront is
> part of that process - once we are clear on the
> approach and the goals et al - then we can
> distro' those to these interested parties - and
> make sure we're not missing stuff they want
> covered.
>
> Then - as the technical work progresses - we
> can get input from these other groups too.
> Otherwise we end up with a dime-a-dozen ways
> for storing stuff in the registry as they all try and
> build out their own flavours and re-invent the
> wheel.
>
> They are probably going to end up doing that
> anyway - but at least we can give everyone
> an extensible base set of common stuff - and
> a coherent way of managing their extensions.
>
> <trip/> Ooops - just realized that's probably
> another <high-on-the-list/> requirement and goal!!
>
> Joe - do you want to start collating these?!?
>
> Thanks, DW.
> ==========================================
>
> Message text written by "CRAWFORD, Mark"
> >
> Actually, I would say that we leave the xml binding to un/cefact atg.
> Mark Crawford
> Research Fellow - LMI XML Lead
> W3C Advisory Committee, OASIS, RosettaNet Representative
> Vice Chair - OASIS UBL TC & Chair Naming and Design Rules Subcommittee
> Chair - UN/CEFACT XML Syntax Working Group
> Editor - UN/CEFACT Core Components
> ______
> Logistics Management Institute
> 2000 Corporate Ridge, McLean, VA 22102-7805
> (703) 917-7177 Fax (703) 917-7481
> Wireless (703) 655-4810
>
> http://www.lmi.org
> "Opportunity is what you make of it"
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chiusano Joseph <>
> To: Farrukh Najmi <>
> CC: Nikola <>;
>
> <>
> Sent: Wed Jun 04 15:27:18 2003
> Subject: Re: [regrep-cc-review] Kickoff!
>
> <Quote>
> I was undecided between (a) and (b) earlier but your arguments make me
> agree that (a) is the way to go and that (b) is outside our charter and
> more in the purvue of UBL TC.
> </Quote>
>
> So we should create a RIM binding, and leave any definition of an XML
> representation of Core Components to the UBL TC?
>
> <
