Re: [regrep-cc-review] How Should UML Be Treated? (Was: Re: [regrep-cc-review]Kickoff!)

Yes - let's take that one step further:

CCTS p.41, Figure 6-1 depicts the "Core Components and Data Types
Metamodel". What would the actual UML model (not metamodel) of a Core
Component look like? I don't believe there is any example in CCTS
(unless I missed it).

Joe

Farrukh Najmi wrote:
> 
> Chiusano Joseph wrote:
> 
> >
> >So my question is: What would a UML object of a Core Component look
> >like?
> >
> >
> >
> I assume the standard way to represent UML is XMI and MOF?
> 
> --
> Farrukh