Next in thread → Next in month →

Re: [regrep-cc-review] How Should UML Be Treated? (Was: Re: [regrep-cc-review] Kickoff!)

From
Nikola <>
Date
2003-06-06T10:49:53+00:00
ID
001501c32c1b$4b8f5690$190d1818@kubura
Thread
Re: [regrep-cc-review] How Should UML Be Treated? (Was: Re: [regrep-cc-review] Kickoff!)
<Diego>
My argument here is we (Registry TC) already have an XML
serialization capable of accomodating CCTS, and that is
called RIM! If we decide to create another, fine, but we
loose (ar can't take advantage of) some work already spent
with RIM.
</Diego>

++1.

Nikola

"I have made this letter longer than usual because I lack the time to make
it shorter." -- Blaise Pascal
Next in thread → Next in month →