Next in thread → Next in month →

RE: [regrep-cc-review] How Should UML Be Treated? (Was: Re: [regrep-cc-review] Kickoff!)

From
David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <>
Date
2003-06-06T12:58:33+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [regrep-cc-review] How Should UML Be Treated? (Was: Re: [regrep-cc-review] Kickoff!)
Paul,

OK,

That works,

Thanks, DW.
=============================
Message text written by "MACIAS, Paul"
> 
David,

I think you're taking my comment farther than I intended.  I merely meant
that we have to ensure there is a mapping of the required metadata to the
RIM, not that we have to define an API to extract the information out of a
UML object.  How the metadata gets into the registry can take a number of
courses that vendors can develop.  I think we need to provide the
verification that the registry "can" capture the elements, not the "how".

-Paul
<
Next in thread → Next in month →