Re: [regrep-cc-review] Bypass Properties?

Great. Unless anyone else objects, let's proceed down this path and see
if it bites us down the road.

Joe

Diego Ballvé wrote:
> 
> <Quote>
> I'm wondering if we can bypass the notion of Properties (as defined in
> CCTS) in registry, and associate Data Types directly with BCCs without
> having an intermediary entity (Property). So the attributes of "Property
> Term" and "Cardinality" that belong to Core Component Properties (see
> [S10], p. 76) would now belong to Basic Core Components (and Association
> Core Components as well I believe).
> </Quote>
> 
> ++1. IMO this would simplify things and create no harm.
> 
> Diego