Re: [Fwd: [regrep-cc-review] BCC as RIM Association]

Thanks Diego. Attached please find Diego's modified Figure 7-1, for our
reference purposes.

The only further modification I would make to this excellent figure is
to not represent "CC Property" as an entity, as it is here (and was in
the CCTS Figure 7-1). We've been talking about "relocating" the CC
Property attributes (Property Term and Cardinality) elsewhere  - more
specifically:

Property Term - an attribute of BCC
Cardinality   - an attribute of BCC (occurrences of a BCC within an ACC)
and ASCC (occurrences of an ASCC within another ACC) 

Thoughts?

Joe

Diego Ballvé wrote:
> 
> Here you are.
> 
> Diego
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Chiusano Joseph [mailto:]
> > Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 2:22 PM
> > To: Diego Ballvé
> > Subject: [Fwd: [regrep-cc-review] BCC as RIM Association]
> >
> >
> > Diego,
> >
> > Sorry to bother you on this - can you please resend me the UML diagram
> > from this e-mail? I think I misfiled/accidently deleted the
> > original. I
> > look forward to seeing it - and thanks for creating it!
> >
> > Joe
> >
> 
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                                          Name: figure7-1-newInterpretation.jpg
>    figure7-1-newInterpretation.jpg       Type: JPEG Image (image/jpeg)
>                                      Encoding: base64
>                                   Description: figure7-1-newInterpretation.jpg