Next in thread → Next in month →

Re: [FARRUKH AND NIKOLA] Re: [regrep-cc-review] ObjectTypes for CCTS

From
Garrukh @ajmi
Date
2003-07-01T14:23:16+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [FARRUKH AND NIKOLA] Re: [regrep-cc-review] ObjectTypes for CCTS
+1 on Diego's suggestion.

One other minor correction is that ExtrinsicObject is under 
RegistryEntry in ebRIM.

BTW I am on vacation and infrequently online.

--
Regard,
Farrukh

Chiusano Joseph wrote:

>[Would like Farrukh and Nikola's input]
>
><Quote>
>Though I'd add one more layer, the "CCTS Objects" or whatever name we
>decide for, between Extrinsic Object and ACC/BCC/etc.
></Quote>
>
>I can definitely see the value in that. So our hierarchy would look as
>follows (I guess the "other" Extrinsic Objects would be "Non-CCTS", but
>am open to better terms):
>
>Object Type
>     |
>RegistryObject
>  |          |  
>Registry  Extrinsic  
> Entry     Object    etc.
>         |        |
>       CCTS	Non-CCTS
>    |   |    |         |
>   ACC ASCC BCC etc. (all others)
>
>Farrukh and Nikola, what do you think of this?
>
>Joe
>
>Diego Ballvé wrote:
>  
>
>><Quote>
>>In a nutshell, Diego has taken all of the CCTS object types (12 in all)
>>and classified them as follows:
>>
>>Object Type
>>     |
>>CCTS Objects
>> |   |    |
>>ACC ASCC BCC etc.
>>
>>Farrukh and Nikola have proposed:
>>
>>Object Type
>>     |
>>RegistryObject
>>  |          |
>>Registry  Extrinsic
>> Entry     Object    etc.
>>         |   |    |
>>        ACC ASCC BCC etc.
>>
>>Farrukh and Nikola's approach was accepted on our TC call yesterday. Is
>>everyone (especially Diego) comfortable with this representation of Core
>>Component Object Types?
>></Quote>
>>
>>Comfortable, yes. Though I'd add one more layer, the "CCTS Objects" or
>>whatever name we decide for, between Extrinsic Object and ACC/BCC/etc.
>>
>>Reason is to separate CCTS ExtrinsicObjects from other specs
>>ExtrinsicObjects that might appear later.
>>
>>Diego
>>
>>Ps. Sorry for missing the TC calls, but the time is not so good for
>>me. I could attend if I would be really needed.
>>
>>You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep-cc-review/members/leave_workgroup.php
>>
Next in thread → Next in month →