Yes - that makes sense.
Using parts of the CCTS p.12 example, I'm seeing this as follows:
- Person. Details: A stored ACC
- Address. Details: A stored ACC
- ResidenceAddress. Details: A stored [name pending - is this an ABIE,
another ACC, or some other type of entity?]
- Person. Residence. Address - A stored ASCC, that can be represented in
the registry as an Association. The Association would carry the ASCC
name in its attributes (which would be Slots).
And if there is a need to create another ASCC using "Address. Details"
"joined" to a different ACC (which there most likely would be), this
could simply be another Association.
Joe
"CRAWFORD, Mark" wrote:
>
> I wrote -
>
> > I am not sure I agree with the notion that an ASCC can stand
> > on its own in the registry. I believe it must always be
> > associated with at least one ACC.
>
> One slight correction to the following - I don't mean to imply that the ASCC should not be a separate entry in the registry, only that it must have a direct correlation with its associated ACC that describes its properties.
>
> Mark
>
>
> You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep-cc-review/members/leave_workgroup.php
