Title: Re: [regrep-cc-review] CC Serialization and UBL-CoreComponentParameters.xsd
UBL should not be considered normative for CCTS. The documentation requirements for ccts are those contained in ccts section 7 - no more, no less.
Mark Crawford
Research Fellow - LMI XML Lead
W3C Advisory Committee, OASIS, RosettaNet Representative
Vice Chair - OASIS UBL TC & Chair Naming and Design Rules Subcommittee
Chair - UN/CEFACT XML Syntax Working Group
Editor - UN/CEFACT Core Components
______
Logistics Management Institute
2000 Corporate Ridge, McLean, VA 22102-7805
(703) 917-7177 Fax (703) 917-7481
Wireless (703) 655-4810
http://www.lmi.org
"Opportunity is what you make of it"
-----Original Message-----
From: Antti Jokipii <>
To: Duane Nickull <>
CC: <>; <>
Sent: Mon Apr 05 06:02:12 2004
Subject: RE: [regrep-cc-review] CC Serialization and UBL-CoreComponentParameters.xsd
Hi,
In UBL, "documentation" of data elements is defined in CoreComponentParameters (and used as a documentation of generated XML schema elements).
Example:
<ccts:Component xmlns:ccts="urn:oasis:names:tc:ubl:CoreComponentParameters:1:0-beta">
<ccts:CategoryCode>BBIE</ccts:CategoryCode>
<ccts:DictionaryEntryName>Contact. Telephone. Text</ccts:DictionaryEntryName>
<ccts:Definition>The number or virtual address of a telephone in a telecommunication system </ccts:Definition>
<ccts:ObjectClass>Contact</ccts:ObjectClass>
<ccts:PropertyTerm>Telephone</ccts:PropertyTerm>
<ccts:RepresentationTerm>Text</ccts:RepresentationTerm>
<ccts:DataType>Text.Type</ccts:DataType>
</ccts:Component>
I think that Data Element Metadata(DEM) should include all information that is in UBL CoreComponentParameters...
Also CC serialization format could be based on CoreComponentParameters if we add there parts that are missing (like UUID, version information, etc).
-----Original Message-----
From: Duane Nickull [mailto:]
Sent: 1. huhtikuuta 2004 0:14
To: Antti Jokipii
Cc: ;
Subject: Re: [regrep-cc-review] CC Serialization and
UBL-CoreComponentParameters.xsd
Antti:
Is it possible for you to make a presentation to the registry group on
what aspects you suggest we review? There is a lot of information there
and it would be more efficient to have this done by phone. I can ask
Kathryn to put this on the agenda.
Thanks
Duane
Antti Jokipii wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I think that UBL CoreComponentParameters should be reviewed...
>
>Beta: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ubl/lcsc/UBLv1-beta/xsd/common/UBL-CoreComponentParameters-1.0-beta.xsd
>
>--------------------------------------------
>Antti Jokipii
>Chief Technology Advisor
>Republica Corp., R & D Labs
>Ohjelmakaari 1, 40500 Jyväskylä, Finland
>E-Mail
>GSM +358 41 57 186 99
>http://www.republica.fi/
>http://www.x-fetch.com/
>
>To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep-cc-review/members/leave_workgroup.php.
>
>
>
--
Senior Standards Strategist
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://www.adobe.com
To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep-cc-review/members/leave_workgroup.php.
