David RR Webber wrote:
>Duane,
>
>Finally you have clarified the question you were trying to ask
>(see bottom).
>
>The mechanism you have described assumes you are using
>CC and BIEs with an ebXML Registry. This of course is only
>one use case.
>
>The use case I am focusing on is the broader one. It does not
>mandate the use of ebXML Registry - and provides support
>for industry groups that may already have developed their
>own CCs and codification schemes ( UDEF, RosettaNet, OAGi,
>X12, CEFACT and more).
>
>If you want to lock CCTS to ebXML Registry and UUID - then
>what you are describing is an approach.
>
>I however believe that the CCTS has not made this decision -
>and that the UID system (i.e. a human readable domain
>specific CODIFICATION system) is used to uniquely identify
>BIEs, CC and more equally applies and is being used.
>
>
Any work in the CCReview sub-team I assume is to address the use of CCTS
specs in a ebXML Registry context.
Take ebXML Registry out of tech picture and in my opinion the problems
is outside the scope of the ebXML Registry TC or any of its SCs.
--
Regards,
Farrukh
