Re: Proposal for supporting Service and ServiceBinding

From
Farrukh Najmi <>
Date
2001-09-05T00:22:14+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: Proposal for supporting Service and ServiceBinding
Team,

I would like to propose a RAWS team meeting to discuss the details of this proposal
sometime tomorrow or Thursday. How about meeting from 4-5pm US EDT tomorrow? If that
does not work, how about sometime between 2-4pm on Thursday?

The agenda for the meeting is to discuss the the proposal so we all have a common
understanding and have a chance to identify issues and suggest improvements.

Please let me know your preferences right away.

--
Regards,
Farrukh


"Patil, Sanjay" wrote:

> Here is a proposal for supporting Service and ServiceBinding objects
> as first class object in the RIM.
>  <<SupportServiceAndServiceBinding.doc>>
>
> In order to be readily useful, a registry needs to have inherent support for
> the commonly used business documents. Business Service interface and the
> technical binding of these Business Service interfaces seem to be falling in
> such a category.
>
>         1.      Providing inherent support for common business documents.
>         2.      Functionally complete in comparison with other Registry
> Standards
>
> Please review the proposal and let us start discussing it over the mail
> list.
>
> thanks,
> Sanjay Patil
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------------------
> IONA
> Total Business Integration (TM)
> Phone: 408 350 9619                                 http://www.iona.com
>
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                                           Name: SupportServiceAndServiceBinding.doc
>    SupportServiceAndServiceBinding.doc    Type: WINWORD File (application/msword)
>                                       Encoding: BASE64