Re: Ballot: RAWS Proposal

Dear Lisa,

 

I don;t have the vote, but I agree with 
that.

 

I think that providing Web Service Interface in 
Registry is a very important thing.

TRP is quite heavy for query processing 
of RS. On the other hand, Soap interface is very easy to implement 
from my development experience of RS.

 

Good Luck!

  
----- Original Message ----- 

  
From: Lisa 
  Carnahan 

  
To:  

  
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 2:38 
  AM

  
Subject: Ballot: RAWS Proposal

  

Hello All,

This is a ballot for the proposal 
  submitted by the RAWS team titled ebXML Registry as a Web Service.  
  The proposal can be found in two messages from our archive.  
  

1. The message http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/regrep/200108/msg00050html contains the proposal document from the RAWS 
  team.  This proposal document replaces the one contained in the zip file 
  attached to http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/regrep/200108/msg00036.html 
  .
2. The companion documents to the proposal document can be found at http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/regrep/200108/msg00036.html . (Note this is the zip file containing the .doc 
  file replaced in #1 above.)

This proposal has been available for 
  discussion for a few weeks.  There has been minimal discussion in the 
  form of questions, comments on the TC list.  Therefor, I'm calling for a 
  ballot.

Agree or Disagree: The ebXML Registry as a Web Service 
  Proposal should be accepted as part of the TC draft specifications.  
  Appropriate changes, based on the recommendations made in the Proposal, should 
  be made to the specifications.

--lisa