← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →
[regrep] some general v01 RS comments
We MUST begin to use formal language when describing required or recommended behaviors. I RECOMMEND that we use RFC 2119 as the basis for the required vs. optional language in the specifications. For example, within the RS v1.01 specification, we currently have: Line 2682: It is suggested but not required that message payloads exchanged between clients and Let's change this to: Line 2682: It is RECOMMENDED that message payloads exchanged between clients and Thanks, Joel Munter Intel / eBusiness Solutions Lab (480) 552-3076 (602) 790-0924 (cell)
← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →