Munter, Joel D wrote:
>Seeing ebXML based services "registered" in a UDDI registry
>(semi-private or the public UBR) and therefore discoverable in a demo
>may go a long way toward eliminating some confusion.
>
I am not sure how showing ebXML artifacts registered in a non-ebXML
Registry eliminates confusion regarding ebXML Registries role in web
services. I would say your suggestion would further obfuscate the issue.
That confusion, if it indeed exists, is best cleared by showing web
services "registered" in an *ebXML Registry* (public or private). This
is essentially what Joe was suggesting and I second his suggestion.
>
>The Technical note being drafted by Kibakura-san (Fujitsu) and being
>discussed on the UDDI-spec dist list has come along way. I recommend
>that you all read this and comment as you need to.
>
>Joel Munter, Intel
>desk: 480.552.3076
>cell: 602.790.0924
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Chiusano Joseph [mailto:]
>Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 9:13 AM
>To: Matthew MacKenzie
>Cc: Anne Thomas Manes; Max Voskob; Still Erik R; OASIS regrep
>Subject: Re: [regrep] Describing ebXML Reg/Rep - observations from Santa
>Fe
>
>One way to help remedy this perception might be to present on
>"Registering Web Services in an ebXML Registry" at some of the Web
>services conferences, such as Web Services One.
>
>Some other things that might help are the Best Practices paper on
>registering Web services in an ebXML Registry (currently in progress),
>and perhaps in the future a high-level mapping between the 2 registry
>architectures (such as "ebXML Registry Classification is *roughly*
>equivalent to UDDI categoryBag", "ebXML Organization is *roughly*
>equivalent to UDDI businessEntity", etc.)
>
>Joe
>
>Matthew MacKenzie wrote:
>
>
>>Anne,
>>
>>You're right on. ebXML != Web Services, at least not general
>>perception wise. I'd like to see that changed somewhat, ebXML
>>messaging is web services based, and ebXML registry is a web service.
>>
>>On Thursday, Jan 30, 2003, at 07:40 America/Vancouver, Anne Thomas
>>Manes wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>I think RegRep's biggest issue is that it's so closely associated
>>>
>>>
>with
>
>
>>>ebXML, and when most people think of Web services, they think of
>>>
>>>
>SOAP,
>
>
>>>not
>>>ebXML. Likewise, when they think of a Web services registry, they
>>>think of
>>>UDDI.
>>>
>>>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------
>To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
>manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
>
>
--
Regards,
Farrukh
