Re: [regrep] Files uploaded for review

Very good point. We shoudl be very careful to reference line/section 
numbers. What would be really helpful is if there is a string to serach 
for like "quick brown fox jumpe....". Thanks for the suggestion.

I think I am am done for this round of commits. The commits included 
significant content contributed by  Nikola and Matt.

This are looking good. I look forward to your final comments on 2.4. We 
will then update the documents to address the final comments and post 
2.5 for TC approval ballot.

Thanks for everyone's participation and contribution.

-- 
Regards,
Farrukh



Breininger, Kathryn R wrote:

>How about to TC list, and reference the line number or section number and paragraph.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Farrukh Najmi [mailto:]
>Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2003 12:02 PM
>To: 
>Subject: [regrep] Files uploaded for review
>
>
>Team,
>
>I have updated the specs for fixes discussed in last weeks TC meeting. 
>Though the docs have Tracked Chnages that can be turned on, I suggest 
>that we all review end to end. If you post comments then please 
>categorize them in the following manner:
>
>-Content Issue (e.g. spec bug, design flaw, consistency issue etc.)
>
>-Readability / Understandability Issue (content is not clear, hard to 
>follow)
>
>-Editorial issue (e.g. typos, look and feel, grammar, syntax)
>
>I have checked and it seems that the comments that KAVI allows to be attached to documents allow you to format your text in bullets etc. However, that would not allow threaded discussions to take place on comments. 
>
>Any thoughts on whether comments should be posted to TC lists or attached to docuemnts?
>
>  
>