Re: [regrep] Technical Note: Registering Web Services in an ebXML Registry

Peter,

Thank you for your comments - I definitely understand where you are
coming from.

Since this quote was taken directly from the ebRIM spec v2.10 (the most
recent version has it as well), I would recommend that we keep the two
documents in sync. That is:

(1) Update the document we are voting on and the ebRIM spec, or
(2) Update neither

Kind Regards,
Joe

Peter Kacandes wrote:
> 
> I realize this comment is a bit a late, but I guess better late than never.
> 
> In the first paragraph it says:
> "Such information is used to facilitate ebXML-based Business to Business
> (B2B) partnerships and transactions."
> 
> I think this sentence is unneccessarily restrictive. As the following
> sentence goes on to say, the registered content can basically be anything.
> 
> In my own case, the government agencies that we are working with are looking
> at using the REg/Rep to store PDF documents and form templates which would
> be used both internally by people in the government who are designing eGov
> processes and by constituents who want to transact business with the
> government via the forms.
> 
> These transactions aren't particularly "ebXML-based" per se, and they are
> not B2B, but rather G2C, G2G, and G2B.
> 
> Like I said, it may be a nit, but we might not want to restrict ourselves.
> 
> cheers
> 
> pk
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fuger, Sally [mailto:]
> Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 2:08 PM
> To: Breininger, Kathryn R; Chiusano Joseph; ; ebXML
> Regrep (E-mail)
> Subject: [regrep] Technical Note: Registering Web Services in an ebXML
> Registry
> 
> I forgot to add the line numbers to the version I sent out a few minutes
> ago. If you received it, please discard it. Attached is the updated version
> of Joe's Technical Note (nee Best Practices document) for everyone's review.
> 
> Sally