Re: [regrep] V3.0 of ebXML for SOA

Matthew MacKenzie wrote:

> If there is an ebXML Architecture, it should not be agnostic to 
> implementation. 

I think I understand above to mean that ebXML Architecture should be 
implementable and not some pie-in-sky that has no basis in reality. If 
so I agree.

> In other words, ebxml-bp should be specified over BPEL. 

Now you have lost me. What does line above have to do with the first 
statement?

--
Farrukh