Summary ???? Re: [regrep] V3.0 of ebXML for SOA

All:

This thread and it's size came as a bit of a surprise.  Needless to say, 
I am overjoyed that their seems to be a consensus to continue and build 
upon the ebXML v 1.04 Technical Architecture.

Since this is the Regrep groups list, I propose that I complete the task 
of getting an infrastructure in place for a new ebXML TA TC and w 
econtinue this thread on the new TC list.

Thank you all - we hope we can count on your continued involvement in 
the new TC.

Best wishes for the holiday season.

Duane Nickull

Farrukh Najmi wrote:

>
> Matthew MacKenzie wrote:
>
>> It was an example. Would it make sense to have an "ebXML 
>> architecture" which could be interpreted to allow using UDDI, SOAP 
>> and BPEL instead of ebReg+ebMS+ebBP? I think not. 
>
>
> Aah! I understand and agree completely.
>
> Your statement "ebxml-bp should be specified over BPEL" threw me off 
> as I incorrectly interpretted it as you suggesting the ebxml-bp should 
> be re-define to layer on top of BPEL. Needless to say I was surprised.
>
> Thanks for clearing up things and restoring my sanity ;-)
>
> -- 
> Farrukh
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster 
> of the OASIS TC), go to 
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/members/leave_workgroup.php. 
>
>

-- 
Senior Standards Strategist
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://www.adobe.com