David RR Webber wrote:
>...Furthermore we are looking within the new Registry
>SCM work to define what the semantic content
>is in an XML instance in the Registry that will
>work for those ContentReferences...
>
David:
You should be aware that it will not necessarily be an XML registry
instance (as was explained ot me). CCRIM decided before I joined that
CC's will be held as a RIM instances. It is unclear how that will be
serialized into XML. I am assuming that the RSS will be expanded to
meet those requirements of getting an XML instance back as a return to a
query. Since CAM requires this, you are probably a great person to
assemble the requirements for such.
>I do not see any reason to modify the CCTS
>specification at this point, nor the RIM binding.
>
[DN] Joseph has identified some definiciencies. We have to discuss the
impact of those and decide how to handle them in order to get the *CC's
and any *BIE's into a registry system. I would not rule out small
changes to either at this point.
A face to face meeting would be useful for this. Maybe we can set
something up in DC?
Duane
--
Senior Standards Strategist
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://www.adobe.com
