Re: [regrep] Final draft recommendations for CC's and Registry -UML/UMM Profile for CCTS

From
Anders W. Tell <>
Date
2004-12-13T21:41:24+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [regrep] Final draft recommendations for CC's and Registry -UML/UMM Profile for CCTS
Duane Nickull wrote:

> XMI would be notoriously innefficient as a storage mechanism for UML 
> projects.  

Could you elaborate on this ? Most UML tools use XMI based formats so it 
must be usable. What are your concerns?

/anders