Re: [regrep] Proposal to remove AddSlotsRequest

Farrukh Najmi wrote:

>
> Here is another scope reduction suggestion as I work through latest 
> specs looking for inconsistencies and mistakes.
>
> I think we should remove the AddSlotsRequest protocol from 
> LifeCycleManager service interface defined in ebRS for the following 
> reasons:
>
> -We do not have addXXXRequest where XXX is Classification, 
> ExternalIdentifier etc. so addSlotsRequest is inconsistent
>
> -UpdateObjectsRequest could be used already to add Slots to an Object. 
> This was not the case when we had addSlotsRequest added to spec
>
> Does any one see any reason for us to keep this apparent cruft in the 
> registry protocols?
>
Oops. I should have added that we should also remove the 
RemoveSlotsRequest protocol if we remove AddSlotsRequest protocol from 
LifeCycleManager service interface

-- 
Regards,
Farrukh