Re: [regrep] Proposed changes to ebMS Binding and HTTP Binding

>MacKenzie: I don't know that it matters.  The two major implementations have not really
>supported the ebMS binding, and there have not been many complaints that I
>can remember.
>  
>
mm1: Perhaps we should separate the two major implementations from the 
question Joe is asking, which is an integratable ebXML framework. Thanks.

>Chiusano: Does removing the ebMS binding "break" anyone's perception (within or outside
>of OASIS) of an integratable ebXML framework? 
>