was Reg/Rep 1/20/2005: Comments on ebRS v3.0 Draft

Monica J. Martin wrote:
 > [general] Should we consider breaking out the SAML profile similar to
 > how WS-Security OASIS has approached the use of token profiles? One
 > editorial motivator for asking this is the document is getting very
 > long. Some of the specialized, advanced functions could be held in
 > separate documents/appendices/etc.

+1. I also prefer the Divide Et Impera approach.

I'd already suggested to Farrukh to consider moving RIM chapter 9 
(Access Control Information Model) out from RIM document. Besides the 
title (..Information Model) that chapter is long and has little in 
common with the other chapters in that document from the perspective 
that it does not define new RIM classes.

Of course the tradeoffs must be considered, i.e., there'd be one more 
document to maintain - but i still think it is easier to maintain small 
parts than a big junk.

Diego

-- 
Diego Ballve
Digital Artefacts Europe
http://www.digital-artefacts.fi