← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →

[continuation] CCTS discuss - To serialize of not to serialize? Duane/Ivan

From
David Webber \(XML\) <>
Date
2005-01-17T21:39:26+00:00
ID
264801c4fcdc$ff9cb040$6e01a8c0@DRRW01
Thread
[continuation] CCTS discuss - To serialize of not to serialize? Duane/Ivan
Duane,

And the other questions are "What would I use it for, and how?".

It's not that this is holding up adoption - but that this is the
essence here between a design time modelling technology
and a runtime implementation solution.

OK that is 52 words before I mention CAM.  The road
to adoption at runtime IMHO is through CAM and its
support for CCTS into the model layer.

Here's the link to the presentation I gave at DHS on
Friday around this - with examples:

http://drrw.net/CAM/presentations/Overview%20of%20CCTS%20and%20CAM%20and%20Registry%20PPT.zip

I also intend to post the "reader's digest" executive version of this -
since the above
is comprehensive and technical focused.

Enjoy, DW

=========================================
> The question you should ask your self is this
>
> "If someone sends me a core component, what will I get?"
>
> That is holding up adoption.
>
> Duane
>
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →