Breininger, Kathryn R wrote:
> The graphic in the ppt may not be representing the whole picture as well
> as it should. The references to services in the diagram may imply to
> folks that the registry is only for registering services, missing the
> rich capability to register any type of asset, including services.
> Perhaps we should use a higher level graphic? Would it be better to use
> Figure 1 from the RS, which shows a simplified view of ebXML Registry
> architecture?
I don't think so. We already describe the parts (as features) in slide
4. Given the limited number of slides, I find a picture telling "what is
it for" more appealing than "how is it organized". I think if the
audience gets interested in the business value of regrep they will
search and find more about the architecture.
Regards
Diego
--
Diego Ballve
Digital Artefacts Europe
http://www.digital-artefacts.fi/
