Re: xml:base

James Clark wrote:
> 
> Should the "include" element pay attention to xml:base
> (http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlbase/)?
> 
> My view is that xml:base is a sensible idea, and TREX should pay
> attention to it.

+1

Eric

> James

-- 
See you in Austin (Knowledge Technologies 2001)
              http://www.gca.org/attend/2001_conferences/kt_2001/mon.htm
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist       Dyomedea                    http://dyomedea.com
http://xmlfr.org         http://4xt.org              http://ducotede.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------