At 11:43 2001 03 14 +0700, James Clark wrote:
>At the moment to model an exclusion in TREX, you have to use concur.
>Are exclusions important enough to be worth this? My feeling is that
>they are important enough for documents (eg footnotes don't nest) to
>justify this.
I believe so. I find that XML's lack of exclusions is the biggest
hole in XML's content modeling capabilities compared to SGML. I
don't have a good sense of how much complexity this adds to TREX,
so I'm not able to place it on either side of the 80/20 myself,
but from a user's point of view, exclusions are fairly nice to have.
paul
