James Clark wrote:
> I believe the concept of restriction in XML Schema Part 2 is broken. The
> only way of treating XML Schema Part 2 facets that I have been able to find
> that isn't broken is to treat them as parameters. If facets are just
> parameters, what would derivation mean?
I agree that restriction in XML Schema Part 2 has problems. You are not
opposing to assigning a name to a datatype combined with some parameters. Am
I right?
James Clark wrote:
> <data type="xsd:int">
> <choice>
> <value>1</value>
> <value>2</value>
> </choice>
> </data>
Is this <choice> a constraint on value spaces (and then lexical spaces)?
Cheers,
Makoto
