Re: Datatypes

James Clark wrote:

> I think this is the crucial issue.  If we don't allow this, then we can have
> a significantly simpler design along the lines of:
> 
>   http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/trex/200105/msg00087.html

To make our lang simpler, I am happy to make it slightly ad-hoc.
Let's forget types derived from user-defined types.

Cheers,

Makoto