Re: combine

> Sounds interesting. A "computationally non-trivial nice-to-have" would
> be combine="restrict". This would be the same as replace, but it would
> be an error if the new content model was not a strict subset of the
> current content model.

Well, it's a challenge, to say the least.

If RELAX NG is restricted to the expressiveness of GNF, then I believe
this requirement could be served by a pre-processor (as well as many
other syntax sugars).

--
Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI                          +1 650 786 0721
Sun Microsystems