James Clark wrote:
> The NOTATION type of XML Schema doesn't use notation declarations from the
> DTD. It uses NOTATION declarations from the Schema. You can't use
> NOTATION directly in a Schema; you have to derive a type by specifying an
> enumeration. If you ignore the PSV infoset, then it can be simulated by an
> enumeration of type QName.
>
> This means that the notation of unparsed entities referenced by instances of
> the ENTITY datatype are unrelated to notations referenced by instances of
> the NOTATION datatype!
>
> Other datatyping systems might want to have a NOTATION type that works
> uniformly with ENTITY referencing NOTATIONS declared in the DTD (like I
> believe RELAX does).
I think Kawaguchi-san already understands. What he is asking is this:
if a RELAX NG pattern references to the NOTATION type of XML Schema,
what will happen? Never matched? (This is fine to me.) Or, do we
introduce "notation" declarations? (No!)
Cheers,
Makoto
