Next in thread → Next in month →

Re: Issue: shall we restrict subordinates of <oneOrMore>

From
James Clark <>
Date
2001-05-24T03:22:20+00:00
ID
034001c0e400$5ee0d620$
Thread
Re: Issue: shall we restrict subordinates of <oneOrMore>
I agree with this.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI" <>
To: "TREX Discussion List" <>
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 5:56 AM
Subject: Re: Issue: shall we restrict subordinates of <oneOrMore>


>
> > If a <oneOrMore> element has an <attribute> descendant, it must not have
a
> > <group> or <interleave> descendant.
>
> This prohibits
>
> <zeroOrMore>
>   <choice>
>     <attribute><anyName/></attribute>
>     <group>
>       <element/><element/>
>     </group>
>   </choice>
> </zeroOrMore>
>
> Which is somewhat artificial, but still harmless. So I would suggest
>
> If a <oneOrMore> element has an <attribute> descendant, there may not be
> any <group> or <interleave> between <oneOrMore> and <attribute>.
>
> In other words,
>
> If <group> or <interleave> is used under <oneOrMore>, then it cannot
> contain any <attribute>.
>
>
> --
> Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI                          +1 650 786 0721
> Sun Microsystems                   
>
>
>
>
Next in thread → Next in month →