Re: unambiguity constraint

From
Murata Makoto <>
Date
2001-05-05T06:21:48+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: unambiguity constraint
James Clark wrote:

> Define a category to be
...

Is this basically "single type" extended so that name classes 
can be handled correctly?

Given a pattern, possibleElements enumerates all 
(URI-or-MAGIC, local-name-or-MAGIC) pairs for element names that 
occur within this pattern (Here I assume normalization is already 
performed).  Even when such a pair occur in <not> or the 
second operand of <difference>, it is (correctly) enumerated.

You did not mention <ref> in your algorithm.  How do you handle it?

Cheers,

Makoto