Re: Issue: redefinition without the original

> The <define> inside the include only replaces the definitions in C.rng, not
> the definitions in B.rng, so your example is equivalent to:

That's what I wanted to hear. So the implementation is responsible to
detect this as an error. Right?

I thought about this a little bit and reached the conclusion that it
would be hard to implement.


--
Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI                          +1 650 786 0721
Sun Microsystems