Yes, this would be outside the RELAX NG spec. It would come from a separate namespace, as James suggested.
-Mike
---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: Murata Makoto <>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 09:42:17 +0900
>Michael Fitzgerald wrote:
>
>>
>> Just a handful of markup for version 1.0 should prove sufficient to satisfy
>> some important needs.
>
>Such markups should be separated from the spec of RELAX NG, since we do not
>define any semantics for them. If some spec introduces a:default or
>a:defaultValue, the spec should define some subset of RELAX NG such that
>grammars are unambiguous.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Makoto
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
>"unsubscribe" in the body to:
>
