I would like to suggest we switch to using the BSD license
http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.html
for relaxng.sourceforge.net instead of the MIT license
http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html
The only substantive difference is that the BSD license has a
"no-endorsement" clause:
"Neither the name of the <ORGANIZATION> nor the names of its contributors
may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software
without specific prior written permission."
A potential corporate contributor informs me that the lack of a
no-endorsement clause in the MIT license is a problem for them (I'll leave
them to identify themselves if they so wish). I can well understand this,
and I can imagine other corporate contributors having a similar concern.
James
