Message text written by Murata Makoto
>
<oneOrMore>
<choice>
<ref name="foo"/>
<attribute name="bar"/>
</choice>
</oneOrMore>
First, after the decision for Issue 26, we changed the semantics
of oneOrMore so that it disallows colliding attributes. One could
thus argue that the keyword oneOrMore represents two different constructs:
one is to allow repetition of elements freely and the other
is to allow non-colliding repetition of attributes.
Second, the BNF created by James becomes simpler if we disallow
coexistense of attributes and elements in <oneOrMore>. We can
get rid of "repeatable"
<<<<<<<<<<<<
Sounds good to me.
Is repeatable used for anything else?
DW.
