--On 13 July 2001 12:21 -0700 Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI
<> wrote:
>
> In section 7.4,
>
>> Next, we need the concept that one pattern has another pattern has a
>> pattern for a child element or attribute with a particular name.
>
> I couldn't understand the above sentence. Is this a typo? Or am I
> showing my inability to read English?
A typo. Should be "has another pattern *as* a pattern for a child ..."
> In section 4.19, <list><empty/><list> is not transformed to <empty/>.
> Why not?
A string consisting of one or more whitespace characters will match
<list><empty/></list> but not <empty/>. This doesn't make a difference in
the content of an element, but it does make a difference in the content of
an attribute. <list><empty/></list> could be transformed to <value
type="token"/>. Would that be an improvement?
James
