Re: Minor comments on the spec

James Clark wrote:

> > The same change is required for includeContent
> 
> Note that the reference to includeContent is followed by a * in the 
> productions for includeContent and grammarContent.  So I don't believe 
> there's a bug there.

There are no bugs, but includeContent defined here is incosistent with the grammar in 
Appendix A.

Cheers,

Makoto