Yes. I have see things like 'direct child' and 'first immediate child' in
some specs and it gets a bit 'unnormative'! %^}
I like 'child' if order is not an issue, or if order is absolutely
necessary, something like '[first|second|etc] child'. Direct is not direct
enough. -Mike
>> 7)
>>
>> In 4.18, I would like to insert "directly" between "that" and "has a
>> notAllowed child element" and
>I don't agree with that. I think it's confusing to use "direct" with
>"child" in some places and not in others. Readers will wonder how a
>"direct child" is different from a "child".
>
>James
