I know you don't like 7.3, but do you really not understand it? If you
don't understand, please say which inference rules you find hard to
understand.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Murata Makoto" <>
To: <>
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 8:03 AM
Subject: Re: 7.1 and 7.3 are as bad as XML Schema
> James Clark wrote:
>
> > I agree that there is scope for improvement in 7.1, but I don't agree
with
> > you about 7.3. I think the informal concept is very straightforward,
and I
> > don't think the formalization is any harder than section 6.
>
> Let's begin with some facts. Who in the TC understands 7.4 and likes it?
> Apparently, James does and I don't. How about other members?
>
> If you claim that you understand 7.4, please give non-trivial examples of
> key-ambiguous grammars. > each member
>
> Cheers,
>
> Makoto
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
> "unsubscribe" in the body to:
>
>
>
