Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI wrote:
>
> Maybe I should stop messing around this issue and leave it to the big
> guys....
You are probably the tallest in this TC!
> I should have added "for me" to my sentence. Section 6 was very easy for
> me, but that's probably because I am familiar with those inference
> notations and I knew tree regular language. In a way, I knew most of
> the things that will be written in section 6 before I read it.
> Without those knowledge, I think many people will find section 6
> difficult, too.
This observation applies me too. One could argue that my judgement
is biased.
> Anyway, so I think 7.4 is of acceptable complexity.
David said that "do not understand section 7 and especially 7.4 in its
entirety." I would like to hear more from other members.
Cheers,
Makoto
