Re: Annotation issue: other attribute types

> For example, one could allow it to take the value of NOTATION or ENTITY, 
> which would imply the same checking that XML 1.0 does (ie that it would 
> refer to an ENTITY or NOTATION declared in the DTD of the document not in 
> the schema).
> 
> Even NMTOKEN and NMTOKENS could be useful for infoset modification 
> (attribute value normalization) that they imply.

I feel that having these types in the annotation spec is confusing for
average users. They will surely wonder whether they should use NMTOKEN
type in W3C XML Schema or they should use NMTOKEN in the annotation spec.

regards,
--
Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI                          +1 650 786 0721
Sun Microsystems