Re: Comments on the annotations spec

Michael Fitzgerald wrote:

> I think the phrase in the title "DTD Compatability" is fairly accurate now, but 
>what if we need a future annotation that is not really related to DTDs? For the 
>sake of flexibility, I like the title "RELAX NG Annotations."

In that case, I think that independent specs should be created.  I insist that 
anything beyond DTDs is outside the scope of this spec.  Otherwise, we are very 
unlikely to converge.

Cheers,

Makoto