> Just a quick check. I assume that the following schema is compatible
> with the annotation feature:
>
> <element>
> <name>abc</name>
> <other:foo>
> application specific extension
> </other:foo>
> <a:annotation>
> RELAX NG annotation
> </a:annotation>
>
> ...
> </element>
Of course. I see nothing in the spec that would lead anyone to think
otherwise.
>
> If so, can we add a statement like:
>
> --------------
> There may be elements from other namespaces after a RELAX NG element.
> --------------
>
> after the current
>
> --------------
> There may be multiple a:documentation elements specifying documentation
> that apply to the same RELAX NG element.
> --------------
What has this to do with a:documentation? I think adding such a statement
there would be very confusing. I added this at the end of section 1:
"Annotations with the above namespace URI can be used in conjunction with
annotations with other namespace URIs. Annotations with other namespace
URIs are allowed wherever [RELAX NG] specifies that they are allowed."
James
