RE: [relax-ng] Annotations in the non-XML syntax

James: Just as adjacent patterns or name classes in a group require a
connector
James: (e.g. |), so annotation elements that are siblings of patterns or
name
James: classes require a connector (>)

John: I think that ">>" should be used instead of ">" (as in the previous
John: representation), because of its greater visibility.

James: Noted. Anybody else have an opinion?


I like the append connotation of '>>'. It fits in my mind with the
connotation of followAnnotations, so it gets my vote.

Mike