James Clark scripsit:
> "+" as above is open possibility for string concatenation, but that
> requires some parsing lookahead to distinguish it from "+" meaning one or
> more.
I definitely don't like overloading "+".
> Another possibility would be "." as in Perl.
Perl 6 is changing "." to "^" (with "^^" for XOR), so I wouldn't use that
as a precedent. What about mere string concatenation, as in C?
We are dealing with literals here.
--
John Cowan <> http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen, http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith. --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_
