Re: [relax-ng] Why is the start element always mandatory when agrammar is used

On Thu, 27 Jun 2002 18:00:40 +0200
Eric van der Vlist <> wrote:

> Just out of curiousity, is there a reason why as soon as a grammar
> element is used a start element is mandatory even when there is no
> ambiguity about the root element such as in:

I would be confused if your example is legal.  I would argue that 
bar is the start pattern, since it is the first definition.

Cheers,
-- 
MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) <>